Discourse Markers as Indices of Discourse Types: The Case of Spoken and Written Egyptian Arabic
Michal Marmorstein, ISF 2018-2022
Research on DMs has mostly focused on either spoken or written data, showing a symbiotic relation between the functions and distribution of markers and a particular discourse type. The project aims to fill a significant gap both in the study of DMs and discourse types by exploring a varied set of markers across spoken and written (print and digital) forms of discourse in Egyptian (Cairene) Arabic. Egyptian Arabic provides a unique site for the proposed examination as it is a spoken language variety which is now in the process of becoming also a written language. It thus enables special insight into the emergence of conventions and the creation of new discourse types. The project is a first attempt to analyze these new forms of use of Egyptian Arabic from a pragmatic and meta-pragmatic perspective, aimed to identify and explain the new possibilities and constraints of using in writing a language variety so tightly associated with--i.e., adapted to and indexical of--oral-conversational discourse.
Talking about causation: linguistic and psychological perspectives
Elitzur Bar-Asher Siegal & Nora Boneh with York Hagmnayer (Göttingen University)
Niedersachsen-Israel collaboration grant, 2018-2020
Causation is a central concept in human experience and therefore is studied from various perspectives in many different disciplines among them philosophy, linguistics and cognitive psychology. Philosophical accounts of causation have strongly influenced theoretical models in linguistics and psychology. Therefore, it is quite surprising that there is hardly any joint research of psychologists and linguists on causation. In the current project we aim to investigate the notion or the notions of causation jointly by combining methodologies of both fields. Our research is based on findings in cognitive psychology, which indicate that people have a pluralistic conception of causation such that different representations of causality coexist in people's mind. We plan to experimentally study the different notions of causation that people entertain when they use different causative constructions to describe causal relations in the world. This project takes linguistic analysis as the starting point for empirical research. The proposed linguistic analysis identifies the differences between the various causative constructions in the combinations of sufficient and necessary conditions semantically encoded in a given construction. The results of the linguistic analyses on the semantics of different causative constructions will be taken as hypotheses to be evaluated by psychological experimentation. Five experiments, which use different experimental strategies based on established paradigms in psychology, will be used to test the predictions stemming from the linguistic analysis. The experiments will be conducted in three languages, Hebrew, English, and German. This will allow us to find out whether the identified semantic differences in causative constructions are the same across languages. The results of our experiments are relevant both to psychology and to linguistics. They will show cognitive psychologists, studying causal reasoning, which notions of causation are encoded in the causative constructions they use in their instructions and test questions. As the constructions may have affected the findings of previous studies, results might have to be reevaluated and theoretical models explaining the findings may have to be revised. Additionally, the results of the proposed studies will show linguists whether the theoretical frameworks they take as starting points for their analyses capture the notions of causation represented in people's mind.
The development of Modern Hebrew from a theoretical perspective
Edit Doron, ISF 2016-2019
The principal objective of the project is to trace the syntactic trajectory of Modern Hebrew (MH) during its early years. The study aims to contribute to the understanding of, first, the language-internal vs. language-contact origins of the syntactic properties of MH at the stage where it only had L2 speakers (L2 stage), and second, the changes that these properties underwent when MH acquired native speakers (L1 stage). The second issue has practically not been addressed before. And although the first issue has been hotly debated, the debate has often been based on isolated examples, mostly illustrating lexicological, phonological, and morphological characteristics of MH. Only few of the syntactic traits of MH have so far been studied from a historical perspective. The present work will aim to study parameters not previously discussed in the literature whose value setting at the L1 stage could explain the clustering of the innovation of particular syntactic constructions. Such findings would point to a theory of change different from the view found in the literature whereby the first generation of L1 MH speakers were consciously taught the historical values of the Hebrew parameters at school, or made use of general cognitive mechanisms such as analogy and back-formation to simplify the L2 grammar.
Valency and transitivity in contact: the case of Coptic
Eitan Grossman, GIF 2017-2020
The typology of verb borrowing has been studied intensively. However, most studies have focused on the relative borrowability of particular meanings, on the one hand (e.g., Haspelmath & Tadmor 2009), or the morphosyntactic means of integrating loan verbs into the grammatical structure of the target language (e.g., Wohlgemuth 2009). However, almost entirely neglected is the integration of loan verbs into recipient language transitivity and valency patterns. The proposed project aims to address this lacuna by providing an account of this phenomenon with respect to a single contact situation, taking as a test case Coptic-Greek contact in Late Antique and Early Islamic Egypt.
The landscape of N-words
Ivy Sichel & Luka Crnič with Hedde Zeijlstra (Göttingen University)
2016-2019 Niedersachsen-Israel collaboration grant
The project is a systematic study of cross-linguistic variation in the domain of N-words in Negative-Concord systems, across both syntactic and semantic dimensions: whether the N-word is interpreted as a universal or existential quantifier; whether it requires ‘strict’ NC or not; whether the N-word includes morphology equivalent to even or not; how Prof. Anita Mittwoch
distant the N-word may be from its licensing negation; etc. Beyond the immediate descriptive goal, the project aims to establish whether any of these properties cluster, cross-linguistically, in a significant way.
Demonstrative pronouns, deixis, and anaphora
Ivy Sichel, ISF grant 2015-2018
The project examines the landscape of referential autonomy. Referential autonomy, like dependency, is governed by grammatical principles and representations. Two kinds of principles appear to be involved, spanning both sentence-grammar and discourse-grammar: a ban against binding (Principle C), which all d-pronouns are subject to, and another, more stringent, ban, against coindexation, which only a subset of d-pronouns are subject to. What other properties characterize demonstrative pronouns, and are they related to the dimensions which characterize referential dependency? The study of dem-pronouns in a variety of languages, with a special focus on Hebrew and German, may begin to address these questions.
Dative selection between the syntax and the lexicon
Nora Boneh, ISF 2014-2017
This project cross-linguistically explores the divide between core and non-core third or added participants, realized as bare dative marked DPs or as Prepositional Phrases, and expressing such roles as Goal, Recipient, Possessor, Beneficiary/Maleficiary, Affected participant or Attitude Holder. Its objective is to clarify the syntactic and semantic reality behind this wide-spread terminology, and to suggest a novel way to look at argument selection in the case of ditransitives. More broadly, the findings are expected to shed light on the theoretical question of the syntax/lexicon divide, and support a constructivist approach, where syntactic structure contains basic semantic meaning blocks, and roots are inserted from the lexicon with minimal content.
Specifically, the study aims to corroborate two issues: the first concerning the fuzziness of the semantic roles related to core and non-core participants; the second issue concerns the possible attachment sites of core and non-core dative marked participants. The hypotheses that will be put to the test, which tie these two issues together, is that this semantic fuzziness is due to a structural ambiguity, and that possible attachment sites can vary from language to language and have correlates in the type of verbs allowed to participate in dative constructions, and in the range of interpretations these constructions may have.
Syntactic analysis of Old Babylonian Akkadian on the basis of a large-scale corpus
Eran Cohen, ISF 2015–2018
The purposes of this study are:
• First, to further and deepen our knowledge about OB syntax by utilizing a larger corpus as primary material for the inquiry as well as expanding the field of inquiry by adding various understudied issues to the menu, including expansion into the text-linguistic level.
• Second, the results are planned to serve as an aid, and not merely as an abstraction.
• Third, this syntactic study is planned to be accessible to a wide research community, by glossing all text examples, and by preferring transparent linguistic terminology.
Polarity items across languages
Luka Crnič, ISF 2014-2017
The project will focus primarily on uncovering variation in the distribution and semantic import of polarity items, paying special attention to their behavior in previously understudied environments. By uncovering the dimensions of variation among polarity items, we expect to ascertain the universal building blocks of the polarity system as well as shed new light on semantic diversity across languages. The project is also expected to have significant theoretical consequences pertaining to the proper treatment of polarity items.
Alternative-sensitive computations in natural language: focus-sensitive particles and embedded exhaustification
Luka Crnič, GIF I-2353-110.4/2014
Alternative-sensitive computations are pervasive in natural language and they play a fundamental role in a variety of phenomena in syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. The project aims to advance our understanding of their interactions and their processing. Although we plan to focus on just two specific classes of alternative-sensitive computations and their interaction – computations induced by focus-sensitive particles and computations involved in generation of scalar implicatures –, their detailed study is expected to improve our understanding of alternative-sensitive computations more generally and of their import for linguistics and cognitive science.
The Typology of Adposition Borrowing
Eitan Grossman, ISF 2013-2016
Typological approaches have proved extremely illuminating for language contact research. To date, they have been applied to a range of grammatical and lexical categories, as well as a number of basic meanings. This project aims to fill a significant gap in the typology of language contact phenomena, namely, a cross-linguistic study of the borrowing of adpositions and other case markers, based on an extensive language sample. A systematic worldwide study of this phenomenon has never been conducted.
Adpositions – prepositions, postpositions, and other minor types – are well attested in the world’s languages, and they tend to occur in a wide range of grammatical constructions. They are usually situated between grammar and lexicon, and most borrowability scales locate them in the middle, between clear lexical items and grammatical items such as inflectional morphology. However, these scales have been constructed on partial evidence, rather than the basis of a comprehensive cross-linguistic sample. One of the goals of this project is to evaluate the empirical adequacy of such scales, as well as other ‘smaller’ scales that have been proposed in the literature.
Preliminary research has turned up a number of exciting research questions – beyond borrowability – that have not yet been adequately dealt with in discussions of adposition borrowing, e.g., linear order conflicts, case government, polysemy narrowing, the morphosyntactic integration of adpositions, the role of text-type or discourse situation in facilitating or motivating adposition borrowing (or code-switching), areal and historical factors, and more. This project will address these questions in order to identify the observed patterns of adposition borrowing across languages.
Since the issue of adposition borrowing is a multifaceted one, this project will tackle it in a number of ways: a survey of secondary literature, grammars, the construction of a detailed database, as well as several in-depth studies of adposition borrowing in primary text corpora in a number of languages.
This project is intended primarily as a contribution to the typology of language contact, but also as a contribution to the typology of adpositions in general: while it is well known that adpositions are borrowed, this phenomenon rarely makes it into general typological treatments of adpositions. The proposed project aims to address this gap. As Yaron Matras has pointed out, language contact ‘acts as a natural laboratory of language change where properties may become transparent that are otherwise obscure, and so it may allow deeper insights into the functions of grammatical structures and categories.’ As such, the study of adposition borrowing across languages is likely to lead to insights that have relevance for our understanding of language in general.